Script/Text for Three Sisters

I found the play Three Sisters quite funny and witty. The script was well written, with each personality very strong and contrasting. The play had an overall serious and tragic tone. However, there were characters who gave comic relief throughout. Act I was really optimistic, giddy, and really jolly. I especially loved the super long pause for the taking of the picture. It was a great comic relief. I went into the theatre thinking I was going to cry and feel super depressed after wards. Although it was depressing and intense, the comic relief was just enough to relieve those deep feelings.

Anton Checkov is exceptional, really. He is able to get to the point of depression, loneliness, and the search for happiness and love. As one of the characters says, "There is no happiness." We are just bodies floating around searching for our meaning in life. This is so depressing, and really gives us no reason to live. However, the characters each have an optimistic air about them that gives them hope for the future. The Doctor's monologue really gets to the point of this. Happiness is just out there, waiting for us to grab it. However, our lives are so meaningless really. We're just here for no reason it sometimes seems until we find that reason and live our lives to the fullest. However, he realized that his life had come to this part of old age, and he really knew nothing. He was just floating around and wondering if this was at all real, did he even really exist?? It was definitely a low point in the play. It made me think about where my life is going, what I really want to do with my life.

Chekov, well really Tracy Letts (the adapter) was very good at describing feelings and getting to the heart of them. The script captures the essence of depression and the loss of happiness throughout life. It also gets to the heart of marriage, that sometimes we must find someone to help us continue our life because they will help us be successful, as Irina did with the Baron. Also, since the play was during a span of about 5 or so years, I think that's what Alisha, Chris, and I decided on, it shows how much people can change, and fast!

The adaptation and possibly the director made a great choice for the transitions between the two first acts and the two last acts. The music went very well and the dress change and the actors walking around the stage in character was very well put together. I'm not entirely sure if that was a director choice or in the adaptation/script. But it was very well done.

Eveyone in Three Sisters dreamed of a better life, although some were quite satisfied. Kulygin was very satisfied married to his unfaithful wife Masha. He was happy, although she didn't love him, he was perfecty content.

However, life does change. Sometimes it's unexpected. Olga becomes the head mistress. She even says she never saw herself in that position. Masha falls in love with Vershinin, and yet Kulygin is still married to her and still in love with her. Irina marries without love and moves with the Baron, which she never expected. The soldiers are shipped off to Poland and the house is just left empty.

Chekov wrote a fantastic playwright. He understood the search that all people have for happiness. He understood how people yern for the things they cannot reach. Depression is a feeling that takes over everyone. However, the thing that makes or breaks a person is how they deal with that despression of life.

I loved the play. It was so very well-written and spoke to my heart. Loved it!

3 in 1 for 3 Onstage

The stage at Artists Repertory Theatre was quite unique and had many positive effects on my watching the play. I have to admit, I have never encountered a stage quite like this one; this made the experience all the more exciting.

In some strange way, the stage was somewhat of a mix between a proscenium, ¾ thrust, and an arena-style stage. It had the arch in the back, where the actors still acted in, a thrust/platform that jutted out into the center with the audience on three sides, and on this platform, the actors performed on it in 360 degrees. It is easier to understand this knowing that this is actually a black-box style stage; using the black-box’s all-purpose variability to give this stage the best of all worlds. When the actors performed in the forested background, the proscenium arch was there to frame the action. And although the platform was made to be a ¾ thrust, the actors performed in all directions on the compass. I thought that this black-box style of stage was very effective, constantly switching up where the action took place, which in turn kept me on my feet. An example of this is in Act IV, when Masha kept walking in between the trees and Irina was with the Baron on the central platform. The audience paid attention to Irina and the Baron, while still wondering what was going through Masha’s mind, how she seemed so preoccupied wandering through the gardens.

While still being a relatively large space, the stage was still able to remain quite intimate during some scenes. The stage was large enough to accommodate the entire cast without the effect of overcrowding; an example would be the picture taking scene at the party, everyone was onstage but it didn’t seem like anything was being drowned out. Normally, smaller stages would not be able to fit the entire cast onstage without overloading the audience’s visuals and along with that, confusing their focus.

And during the one-on-one scenes, such as the ones between Irina and Tusenbach or Solyony, the sections of the octagonal platform seemed to point to and highlight the said characters. This sort of highlighting was able to let me focus solely on those two actors. Once again, I believe this was a very effective use of the black-box stage’s universal capabilities and further cemented the black-box stage as my favorite type of stage.

If the A.R.T. is able to do this with this stage, I am very excited to see what they can do with other productions (like a musical?). So I give the production crew props for making such an awesome stage that kept me on the edge of my seat, expanding my focus throughout the entire stage space.

~Chris McVey

gone with the directing.. catchy I hope

There has been quite a bit of controversy towards this play. I myself am going to stay as neutral as I can possibly be. I will make sure this post is centered around the directing and critique that rather than stray and hurt a fellow classmates feelings. I understand that actors/actresses must follow the direction that they are given. I must say that I was impressed by the performances that many of my classmates gave, I was very impressed. None of my opinions on the directing have any threat on the performances themselves. I have to be honest about the directors choice in scenary. I was not impressed with the stage set, I did not enjoy having 3 sides to look at. I felt it was distracting, and not for me. I do know though, that other people enjoy being able to see what other audience members are thinking by their expressions. The hardest part for me in completely understanding the meaning behind this play was the non-existent stage props. It is easier for myself to imagine where the scene is supposed to take place and what the characters are supposed to be protraying when they have something more than their lines to make the story come to life. One thing that really did not work for me was the blocking, I was not able to see the actors expressions on their faces at different times. I really would have enjoyed seeing Antigone's expression at times when she was not yelling at someone else. I hope my opinions are not taken out of context. I really did enjoy the protrayal that everyone gave. I know Antigone is a very intense play and kudos to everyone for their performance. I can tell that lines were rehearsed and went over and over. No one went out of character and I really believed every character.

Thank you,
Tracy:)